John MacFarlane
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 27
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 22
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 5
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 21
John MacFarlane
39 papers receiving 2.4k citations
John MacFarlane's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Philosophy 2.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.8k
- History and Philosophy of Science 603
- Language and Linguistics 446
- Cognitive Neuroscience 556
Countries citing papers authored by John MacFarlane
This map shows the geographic impact of John MacFarlane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John MacFarlane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John MacFarlane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John MacFarlane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John MacFarlane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John MacFarlane. The network helps show where John MacFarlane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside John MacFarlane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Assessment Sensitivity Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 423 |
| 2 | 2003 | 301 | |
| 3 | Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 292 |
| 4 | 2010 | 210 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 197 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 197 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 174 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 171 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 167 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 155 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 150 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 120 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 106 | |
| 14 | WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT LOGIC IS FORMAL | 2000 | 82 |
| 15 | In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought | 2004 | 53 |
| 16 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 11 |
About John MacFarlane
John MacFarlane is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Family Practice, having authored 44 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (22 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (2.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (603 citations), Language and Linguistics (446 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (556 citations). John MacFarlane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Niko Kolodny and Colin McGinn. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, The Journal of Philosophy, Synthese and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.