George Bealer

2.9k citations
43 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

George Bealer

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

George Bealer
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • History and Philosophy of Science 478
  • Philosophy 981
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 359
  • General Decision Sciences 18
Replace Ernest Sosa with:
Ernest Sosa United States
Stephen Schiffer United States
Héctor-Neri Castañeda United States
Georges Rey United States
Stephen Yablo United States
William Ramsey United States
Gabriel Segal United Kingdom
Jay F. Rosenberg United States
John L. Tienson United States
Ned Hall United States
George Bealer relative to Ernest Sosa United States Ernest Sosa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ernest Sosa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Bealer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Bealer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Bealer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Bealer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Bealer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Bealer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Bealer. The network helps show where George Bealer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside George Bealer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Bealer Line = papers co-authored together George Bealer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982214
2
Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy
1998130
3 1992118
4 1996115
5 2002104
6 200099
7 198788
8 199870
9 201068
10 199460
11 199653
12 198443
13 199342
14 200436
15 199930
16 197930
17 199325
18 200724
19 197824
20 199823

About George Bealer

George Bealer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (478 citations), Philosophy (981 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (359 citations) and General Decision Sciences (18 citations). George Bealer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Frederick Strawson and Robert Charles Koons. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Perspectives, Philosophical Studies, Noûs and Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact