Stephen Farrow

53 papers receiving 833 citations

Peers

Stephen Farrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 57
  • General Health Professions 218
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 164
  • Education 160
  • Media Technology 47
Replace Michael Albert with:
Michael Albert United States
Mark A. Albanese United States
Debra A. DaRosa United States
Kieran Walsh United Kingdom
Katherine Mackey United States
Sara Kim United States
Maura E. Sullivan United States
Robert Quinn United States
Christopher M. Wittich United States
Saima Chaudhry United States
Stephen Farrow relative to Michael Albert United States Michael Albert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Michael Albert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Farrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Farrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Farrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Farrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Farrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Farrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Farrow. The network helps show where Stephen Farrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Farrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Farrow Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Farrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996104
2 198298
3 198988
4 198282
5 199066
6
The challenge of evaluating surgical procedures.
199260
7 199945
8 200041
9 198541
10 199737
11 199431
12 199027
13 198225
14 197525
15 198516
16 199013
17 198812
18 198710
19 19909
20
Disinfection methods in general practice and health authority clinics: a telephone survey.
19889

About Stephen Farrow

Stephen Farrow is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education, having authored 53 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (57 citations), General Health Professions (218 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (164 citations), Education (160 citations) and Media Technology (47 citations). Stephen Farrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Lejk, Mark Charny, I Robertson, Preethy S. Samuel, F.G.R. Fowkes, Peter A. Lewis, John Lunn, C J Roberts, Nuala Dwyer and Gordon M. Stirrat. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, Postgraduate Medical Journal, Health Policy, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact