Simon Stephens

105 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Simon Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Sensory Systems 746
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 760
  • Neurology 172
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 117
  • Otorhinolaryngology 49
Replace Catherine Smith with:
Catherine Smith Australia
Darya L. Zabelina United States
Christopher L. Stitt United States
Elizabeth A. Krusemark United States
Karina Karolina Kedzior Germany
Akira Uno Japan
Jennifer Adrienne Johnson United States
Robert B. Glassman United States
Yin Wu China
Damian Patrick Birney Australia
Simon Stephens relative to Catherine Smith Australia Catherine Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.3×
Catherine Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Stephens. The network helps show where Simon Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Simon Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985113
2 199489
3 198080
4 198569
5 198567
6 201658
7 200757
8 198054
9 199753
10 198149
11 198248
12 199247
13 199046
14 197542
15 197642
16 197737
17 198637
18 202132
19 199431
20 201231

About Simon Stephens

Simon Stephens is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Management of Technology and Innovation, Neurology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (50 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (42 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (9 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (8 papers), Medical History and Innovations (6 papers), History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Human auditory perception and evaluation (4 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (746 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (760 citations), Neurology (172 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (117 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (49 citations). Simon Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Richard Hallam, John Eugene Lewis, Laurence McKenna, David Paul Goldstein, A. R. D. Thornton, Sarah Hogan, Mike Sadlier, George Onofrei, RONALD HINCHCLIFFE and Veronica Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Otolaryngology, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, International Journal of Audiology, Scandinavian Audiology and Journal of Sound and Vibration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact