Stephen E. Holroyd

45 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Holroyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Analytical Chemistry 443
  • Biophysics 226
  • Animal Science and Zoology 184
  • Food Science 285
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 107
Replace R. Giangiacomo with:
R. Giangiacomo Italy
Poliana M. Santos Brazil
Frank Lundby Norway
Daniel Picque France
Hina Ali Pakistan
Annalisa De Girolamo Italy
Havva Tümay Temiz Türkiye
Werner Luginbühl Switzerland
Isabelle Adt France
Elizabeth M. Calvey United States
Stephen E. Holroyd relative to R. Giangiacomo Italy R. Giangiacomo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
R. Giangiacomo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Holroyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Holroyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Holroyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Holroyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Holroyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Holroyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Holroyd. The network helps show where Stephen E. Holroyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Holroyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Holroyd Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Holroyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010109
2 200892
3 201387
4 201658
5 201955
6 201652
7 201944
8 201342
9 201636
10 199330
11 201630
12 201627
13 201426
14 201323
15 201322
16 201421
17 200920
18 198217
19 201317
20 200717

About Stephen E. Holroyd

Stephen E. Holroyd is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science and Biophysics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (21 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (11 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (6 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (443 citations), Biophysics (226 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (184 citations), Food Science (285 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (107 citations). Stephen E. Holroyd has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Keith C. Gordon, Cushla McGoverin, Tiziana M.P. Cattaneo, Elizabeth Nickless, Per Waaben Hansen, Michél K. Nieuwoudt, David E. Williams, M. Cather Simpson, Geoff Smith and Jaap M Evers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Dairy Technology, International Dairy Journal, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Journal of AOAC International and Journal of Dairy Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact