Journal of AOAC International

6.1k papers and 96.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.1k papers published in Journal of AOAC International in the last decades have received a total of 96.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of AOAC International usually cover Analytical Chemistry (1.9k papers), Food Science (1.7k papers) and Spectroscopy (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (1.1k papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1.0k papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (742 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of AOAC International are Steven J. Lehotay, Frank J Schenck, Michelangelo Anastassiades, Eric A. Decker, Yasukatsu Oshima, Mary Beth Hall, Peter Scott, Mary W Trucksess, Barry V. McCleary and Sandra Macfarlane.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of AOAC International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of AOAC International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of AOAC International.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of AOAC International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of AOAC International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of AOAC International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of AOAC International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025