Stephen Chaplin

26 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Stephen Chaplin
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 56
  • Global and Planetary Change 92
  • Nephrology 25
Replace Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez with:
Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez Spain
Laurence Bérard France
Muhammad Shariful Islam Bangladesh
Sidy Mohamed Seck Senegal
Luke E. Barry Ireland
M. A. Heasman United Kingdom
Namukolo Covic South Africa
James Muwonge United States
Xavier Cussó i Segura Spain
Syed Azim Australia
Stephen Chaplin relative to Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez Spain Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Chaplin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Chaplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Chaplin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Chaplin. The network helps show where Stephen Chaplin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Chaplin Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Chaplin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201875
2 201267
3 198766
4 200536
5 198936
6 202126
7 200825
8 200422
9 200521
10 201218
11 200515
12
Secondary prevention after PCI: the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in the Netherlands.
200414
13 201513
14 201913
15 200912
16 201310
17 20125
18 20234
19 19894
20 20183

About Stephen Chaplin

Stephen Chaplin is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Surgery, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers) and Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (76 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (56 citations), Global and Planetary Change (92 citations) and Nephrology (25 citations). Stephen Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R E Ferner, Jane Mills, Paul Scuffham, Peter Gaskell, J. Isselstein, Julie Ingram, S. Peel, Deborah M. Campoli-Richards, Karen L. Goa and Hannah Chiswell. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, Journal of Medical Economics, Value in Health, Age and Ageing and PharmacoEconomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact