Luke E. Barry

623 citations
24 papers · 393 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Luke E. Barry

23 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Luke E. Barry
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Economics and Econometrics 116
  • Physiology 79
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
  • Global and Planetary Change 55
  • Health 17
Replace Samantha Leigh Larson with:
Samantha Leigh Larson China
Hongwei Jiang China
Vikki O’Neill United Kingdom
Michael R. Bloomberg United States
Vijendra Ingole India
Shannon C. Grabich United States
Ka Hung Chan United Kingdom
Jaime E. Mirowsky United States
Zhihai Ma Canada
Jason Booza United States
Luke E. Barry relative to Samantha Leigh Larson China Samantha Leigh Larson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Samantha Leigh Larson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke E. Barry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke E. Barry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke E. Barry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke E. Barry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke E. Barry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke E. Barry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke E. Barry. The network helps show where Luke E. Barry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke E. Barry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke E. Barry Line = papers co-authored together Luke E. Barry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201878
2 201753
3 201441
4 202039
5 201131
6 201830
7 201816
8 202014
9 201611
10 202310
11 202110
12 20239
13 20208
14 20207
15 20226
16
Smoking prevalence among perinatal women: the role of socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity.
19936
17 20235
18 20205
19 20194
20 20204

About Luke E. Barry

Luke E. Barry is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Physiology, General Health Professions, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (116 citations), Physiology (79 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations), Global and Planetary Change (55 citations) and Health (17 citations). Luke E. Barry has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ciarán O’Neill, Liam G. Heaney, David Price, Joan Sweeney, Koonal Shah, Nancy Devlin, Juan Manuel Ramos Goñi, Richard Yao, Stephen Hynes and Tom M. van Rensburg. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Value in Health, Health Policy and PharmacoEconomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact