Stephen C. Phillips

105 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Stephen C. Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Environmental Chemistry 743
  • Sensory Systems 317
  • Developmental Biology 54
  • Reproductive Medicine 194
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 422
Replace Jean‐Marie Garnier with:
Jean‐Marie Garnier France
Peter H. Barry United States
David Gareth Jones New Zealand
Philìppe Bertrand France
Jan Kučera Czechia
Oliver Schmitt Germany
William J. Schwartz United States
Charles Edward Weaver United States
Martin Stocker Germany
Zhi‐Qi Zhao China
Stephen C. Phillips relative to Jean‐Marie Garnier France Jean‐Marie Garnier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Jean‐Marie Garnier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Phillips. The network helps show where Stephen C. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015339
2 2000317
3 2005307
4 1987149
5 2008145
6 1982107
7 1982107
8 2011104
9 200396
10 199888
11 198584
12 201483
13 201481
14 198477
15 198472
16 200071
17 198369
18 201067
19 198563
20 199261

About Stephen C. Phillips

Stephen C. Phillips is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Geology, Atmospheric Science and Neurology, having authored 106 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (35 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (20 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (14 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (11 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (9 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (743 citations), Sensory Systems (317 citations), Developmental Biology (54 citations), Reproductive Medicine (194 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (422 citations). Stephen C. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian G. Cragg, Lindsay Aitkin, Joel E. Johnson, Jillian J. Kril, Clive G. Harper, Peter Stacey, Ian Harrow, Liviu Giosan, Scott H. Soderling and Joseph A. Beavo. Their work appears in journals such as AAPG Bulletin, Energy & Fuels, Marine and Petroleum Geology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact