Thomas G. Smith
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Michael O. Hammill (6 shared papers)Ian Stirling (4 shared papers)Richard F. Addison (8 shared papers)Jeffery L. Barker (4 shared papers)Morten Skrede Ryg (4 shared papers)Bradley A. Erickson (30 shared papers)Bryan B. Voelzke (33 shared papers)Fraser Andrew Armstrong (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (22 papers)Urology (18 papers)Canadian Journal of Zoology (11 papers)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (7 papers)Science (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas G. Smith
133 papers receiving 4.9k citations
Thomas G. Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
- Urology 853
- Ecology 2.0k
- Atmospheric Science 1.1k
- Developmental Biology 110
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 785
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas G. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas G. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urotrauma: AUA Guideline Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 351 |
| 2 | 1975 | 234 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 219 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 159 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 142 | |
| 6 | 1959 | 126 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 123 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 112 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 111 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 110 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 107 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 104 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 96 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 96 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 96 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 92 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 89 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 88 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 87 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 87 |
About Thomas G. Smith
Thomas G. Smith is a scholar working on Urology, Ecology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Atmospheric Science and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 144 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine animal studies overview (35 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (28 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (10 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (9 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (853 citations), Ecology (2.0k citations), Atmospheric Science (1.1k citations), Developmental Biology (110 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (785 citations). Thomas G. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael O. Hammill, Ian Stirling, Richard F. Addison, Jeffery L. Barker, Morten Skrede Ryg, Bradley A. Erickson, Bryan B. Voelzke, Fraser Andrew Armstrong, Joel E. Brown and Christian Lydersen. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology, Canadian Journal of Zoology, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.