G.Richard Gates

36 papers receiving 775 citations

Peers

G.Richard Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Sensory Systems 317
  • Developmental Biology 143
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 330
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 173
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 121
Replace Antje Brand with:
Antje Brand Germany
Paul L. Knight United States
F. de Ribaupierre Switzerland
William C. Loftus United States
Peggy Shadduck Palombi United States
Liisa A. Tremere United States
Craig A. Atencio United States
James H. Dewson United States
Enquan Gao United States
Stephanie M. Gardner United States
G.Richard Gates relative to Antje Brand Germany Antje Brand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Antje Brand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.Richard Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.Richard Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.Richard Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.Richard Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.Richard Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.Richard Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.Richard Gates. The network helps show where G.Richard Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside G.Richard Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.Richard Gates Line = papers co-authored together G.Richard Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973201
2 198464
3 199353
4 197253
5 197340
6 197339
7 198238
8 197433
9 199032
10 197629
11 198528
12 197427
13 198225
14 197820
15 199815
16 197914
17 197411
18 199511
19 199610
20 197310

About G.Richard Gates

G.Richard Gates is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics and Ecology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (8 papers), Marine animal studies overview (7 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (4 papers), Management Theory and Practice (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (317 citations), Developmental Biology (143 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (330 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (173 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (121 citations). G.Richard Gates has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include James C. Saunders, Roger B. Coles, Lindsay Aitkin, Gregory R. Bock, Robert A. M. Gregson, Ray Cooksey, Stephen C. Phillips, Dennis P. Phillips, J.A. Reynoldson and Brian M. H. Bush. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, Biological Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Journal of Management & Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact