Ian Harrow
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 4
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 9
- Co-authors
- K.A.F. Gration (4 shared papers)Stephen C. Phillips (2 shared papers)J. G. Hildebrand (2 shared papers)T.A. Christensen (2 shared papers)Brian Waldrop (2 shared papers)David B. Sattelle (4 shared papers)Joseph A. Beavo (1 shared paper)Rhona W. Baxendale (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Biology (5 papers)Drug Discovery Today (4 papers)Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology (2 papers)Chemical Senses (1 paper)Parasitology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Ian Harrow
25 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Sensory Systems 190
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 591
- Insect Science 322
- Aging 41
- Small Animals 64
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Harrow
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Harrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Harrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Harrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Harrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Harrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Harrow. The network helps show where Ian Harrow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Harrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 290 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 168 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 125 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 110 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 90 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 90 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 87 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 66 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 42 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 20 | Alpha-bungarotoxin blocks excitatory post-synaptic potentials in an identified insect interneurone [proceedings]. | 1979 | 11 |
About Ian Harrow
Ian Harrow is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Genetics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (190 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (591 citations), Insect Science (322 citations), Aging (41 citations) and Small Animals (64 citations). Ian Harrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include K.A.F. Gration, Stephen C. Phillips, J. G. Hildebrand, J. G. Hildebrand, T.A. Christensen, Brian Waldrop, David B. Sattelle, Joseph A. Beavo, Rhona W. Baxendale and M. Pelhate. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Drug Discovery Today, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Chemical Senses and Parasitology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.