Sida Chen

693 citations
49 papers · 470 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Sida Chen

44 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Sida Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Otorhinolaryngology 69
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Ophthalmology 50
  • Genetics 26
  • Urology 12
Replace Wing Shan Choi with:
Wing Shan Choi Hong Kong
Luís André Mezzomo Brazil
Klaus Wolfgang Eichhorn Germany
Emil N. Sobol Russia
Shirô Watanabe Japan
Hsin‐Ming Chen Taiwan
Cheng‐Jen Chang Taiwan
Junpeng Li China
Sangheon Park South Korea
J Molloy United States
Sida Chen relative to Wing Shan Choi Hong Kong Wing Shan Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×50×
Wing Shan Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sida Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sida Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sida Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sida Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sida Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sida Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sida Chen. The network helps show where Sida Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sida Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sida Chen Line = papers co-authored together Sida Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202358
2 201549
3 201532
4 201928
5 202327
6 201626
7 201721
8 202219
9 202319
10 201717
11 202416
12 201915
13 202413
14
lncRNA FTX promotes asthma progression by sponging miR-590-5p and upregulating JAK2.
202112
15 201510
16 202310
17 20228
18 20207
19 20217
20 20227

About Sida Chen

Sida Chen is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Clinical Biochemistry and Urology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (7 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (5 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers), Wind Energy Research and Development (2 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (69 citations), Internal Medicine (17 citations), Ophthalmology (50 citations), Genetics (26 citations) and Urology (12 citations). Sida Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Quan Shan, Zulai Li, Xiulan Zhang, Jiawei Wang, Xinbo Gao, Wei Wang, Xingyi Li, Wenbin Huang, Shaolin Du and Fei Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as steel research international, PLoS ONE, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Medicine and Tribology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact