Urology

321.8k papers and 6.3M indexed citations i.

About

321.8k papers covering Urology have received a total of 6.3M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Urological Disorders and Treatments, Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research and Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments and also cover the fields of Surgery, Rheumatology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Surgery, Rheumatology and Molecular Biology. Some of the most active scholars covering Urology are Elaine Fuchs, Jan Lindhe, William C. de Groat, Paul Abrams, Ralf Paus, Karl‐Erik Andersson, Christopher R. Chapple, Claus G. Roehrborn, Darwin J. Prockop and Hom‐Lay Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Urology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Urology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Urology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025