Scott Weber

35 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Scott Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • Family Practice 22
  • Health Information Management 35
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 106
Replace Austen El‐Osta with:
Austen El‐Osta United Kingdom
Frank A. Simon Germany
J. Balla Australia
Chien‐Lin Kuo Taiwan
Sebastian R. Alston United States
Tomasz Szmuda Poland
Eman Al-Sharif Saudi Arabia
Dong Wei China
Lene Martin Sweden
Nicholas A. Koontz United States
Scott Weber relative to Austen El‐Osta United Kingdom Austen El‐Osta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Austen El‐Osta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Weber. The network helps show where Scott Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Weber Line = papers co-authored together Scott Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015113
2 201786
3 201047
4 200730
5 201018
6 200816
7 199014
8 200912
9 201411
10
Clinical decision support systems and how critical care clinicians use them.
200711
11 200011
12 20089
13 20217
14 20056
15 20195
16 20145
17 20064
18 20094
19 20093
20 20053

About Scott Weber

Scott Weber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (7 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (6 papers), Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (19 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations), Family Practice (22 citations), Health Information Management (35 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (106 citations). Scott Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Bahrain. Frequent co-authors include Tarek N. Hanna, Jamlik-Omari Johnson, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Dianxu Ren, Kathryn Puskar, Sonya J. Snedecor, Sunita D. Nasta, Kristy M. Walsh, Christina Howlett and Elise A. Chong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, Emergency Radiology, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, Journal of Family Nursing and British Journal of Haematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact