Scott Weber

35 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Scott Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Family Practice 16
  • Health Information Management 30
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 104
  • Research and Theory 5
Replace Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye with:
Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye United States
Sebastian R. Alston United States
Christopher Holcombe United Kingdom
Frank A. Simon Germany
Soham Bandyopadhyay United Kingdom
Kathryn Jackson United States
Eric Nyberg United States
Eman Al-Sharif Saudi Arabia
Carolyn Giordano United States
Samyukta Mullangi United States
Scott Weber relative to Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye United States Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Weber. The network helps show where Scott Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Weber Line = papers co-authored together Scott Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015118
2 201796
3 201048
4 200732
5 201020
6 200819
7 199015
8 200913
9 200011
10 200811
11 201411
12
Clinical decision support systems and how critical care clinicians use them.
200711
13 20218
14 20147
15 20057
16 20235
17 20195
18 20064
19 20094
20 20234

About Scott Weber

Scott Weber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (5 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), Health Information Management (30 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (104 citations) and Research and Theory (5 citations). Scott Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Bahrain. Frequent co-authors include Tarek N. Hanna, Jamlik-Omari Johnson, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Dianxu Ren, Kathryn Puskar, Elise A. Chong, Kristy M. Walsh, Jakub Svoboda, Sunita D. Nasta and Christina Howlett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, Emergency Radiology, Journal of Family Nursing, British Journal of Haematology and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact