Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

23.7k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

1.0k papers receiving 16.0k citations

Peers

Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Research and Theory 455
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 310
  • General Health Professions 6.0k
  • Pharmacy 698
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 489
Replace Journal for Healthcare Quality with:
Journal for Healthcare Quality United States
Oncology nursing forum United States
Health Care Management Review United States
American Journal of Critical Care United States
Clinical Nurse Specialist United States
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing United Kingdom
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy United Kingdom
Journal of Nursing Research Taiwan
Clinical Nursing Research United States
Medical Care Research and Review United States
Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners relative to Journal for Healthcare Quality United States Journal for Healthcare Quality's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Journal for Healthcare Quality · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

About Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

The 1.4k papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners in the last decades have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners usually cover Issues, ethics and legal aspects (63 papers), Research and Theory (23 papers), General Health Professions (307 papers), Emergency Medical Services (32 papers) and Speech and Hearing (28 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Roles and Practices (190 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (40 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (38 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (30 papers), Nursing education and management (23 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (21 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (19 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners are Mary Jo Goolsby, Barbara E. Harrison, Margaret Louis, Judith A. Berry, Eileen Hayes, Sally K. Miller, Johan Andersson, Patricia T. Alpert, Lynn Clark Callister and Karen Dearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact