Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

24k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1989

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

1.3k papers receiving 21.6k citations

Peers

Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Pharmacy 1k
  • General Health Professions 5.8k
  • Research and Theory 818
  • Leadership and Management 390
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 458
Replace International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare with:
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare Australia
Oncology nursing forum United States
Journal of Nursing Research Taiwan
International Journal of Older People Nursing United Kingdom
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety United States
Clinical Nursing Research United States
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy United Kingdom
The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports Australia
Journal for Healthcare Quality United States
Seminars in Oncology Nursing United States
Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners relative to International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare Australia International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

About Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners

The 1.4k papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners in the last decades have received a total of 24k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners usually cover General Health Professions (422 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (27 papers), Leadership and Management (13 papers), Pharmacy (24 papers) and Family Practice (13 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Roles and Practices (296 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (34 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (33 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (26 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (26 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (24 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners are Mary Jo Goolsby, Barbara E. Harrison, Judith A. Berry, Margaret Louis, Christine Aramburu Alegría, Eileen F. Hayes, Sally K. Miller, Lynn Clark Callister, Patricia T. Alpert and Lorna Lou Schumann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact