British Journal of Haematology

20.3k papers and 656.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 20.3k papers published in British Journal of Haematology in the last decades have received a total of 656.2k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Haematology usually cover Hematology (11.6k papers), Genetics (6.4k papers) and Immunology (3.7k papers) specifically the topics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2.7k papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2.5k papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Haematology are Daniel Catovsky, D. A. G. Galton, Georges Flandrin, Peter Wolf, C. Sultan, John M. Bennett, H. R. Gralnick, M Shimoyama, Trevor Baglin and David Keeling.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Haematology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Haematology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Haematology.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Haematology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Haematology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Haematology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Haematology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025