Christopher Holcombe

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Christopher Holcombe
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Health Professions 360
  • Cancer Research 137
  • Oncology 192
  • Surgery 335
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 96
Replace Florence Didier with:
Florence Didier Italy
Miranda Chi‐Mui Chan China
John L. Wilson United States
Tulin D. Cil Canada
Dacita T. K. Suen China
Kate F. Clay United States
Jessa M. Davidson Canada
Luzia Travado Portugal
Sharon L. Bober United States
Wendy S. Schain United States
Christopher Holcombe relative to Florence Didier Italy Florence Didier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Florence Didier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Holcombe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Holcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Holcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Holcombe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Holcombe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Holcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Holcombe. The network helps show where Christopher Holcombe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Holcombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Holcombe Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Holcombe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004233
2 201073
3 201560
4 199555
5 199855
6 200245
7 200143
8 200742
9 201242
10 199538
11 201237
12 200436
13 201632
14 200730
15 200629
16 201129
17 201729
18 201127
19 201824
20 201623

About Christopher Holcombe

Christopher Holcombe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cancer Research, Surgery, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (16 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (16 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (360 citations), Cancer Research (137 citations), Oncology (192 citations), Surgery (335 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (96 citations). Christopher Holcombe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Salmon, Emma Burkitt‐Wright, Bridget Young, Robert E. Mansel, Shelley Potter, Louise Clark, Kieran J. Horgan, Jane M. Blazeby, Michael P.A. Davies and David Ross Sibson. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Patient Education and Counseling, Psycho-Oncology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact