Scott Napper
Impact in
- Microbiology top 1%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Microbial infections and disease research
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Papers in
-
- Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding 16
- Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications 8
- Immunology 21
- Immune Response and Inflammation 11
- Co-authors
- Philip Griebel (39 shared papers)Ryan J. Arsenault (22 shared papers)Jason Kindrachuk (20 shared papers)Andrew Potter (24 shared papers)Anthony Kusalik (28 shared papers)Brett Trost (19 shared papers)Erin Scruten (27 shared papers)Pekka Määttänen (12 shared papers)
- Journals
- Prion (7 papers)PLoS ONE (7 papers)Vaccine (6 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (5 papers)Scientific Reports (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Scott Napper
105 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Microbiology 380
- Animal Science and Zoology 289
- Immunology 444
- Small Animals 139
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Napper
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Napper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Napper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Napper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Napper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Napper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Napper. The network helps show where Scott Napper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Napper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 72 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 66 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 62 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 54 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 53 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 46 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 46 |
About Scott Napper
Scott Napper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology, Microbiology, Epidemiology and Spectroscopy, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (16 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (11 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (10 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (9 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (8 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (380 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (289 citations), Immunology (444 citations), Small Animals (139 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.2k citations). Scott Napper has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Philip Griebel, Ryan J. Arsenault, Jason Kindrachuk, Andrew Potter, Anthony Kusalik, Brett Trost, Erin Scruten, Pekka Määttänen, Lorne A. Babiuk and Neil R. Cashman. Their work appears in journals such as Prion, PLoS ONE, Vaccine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.