John H. E. Nash
Impact in
- Microbiology top 0.5%
- Microbial infections and disease research
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
Papers in
- Microbiology 18
- Microbial infections and disease research 18
- Ecology 15
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 15
- Co-authors
- Eduardo N. Taboada (11 shared papers)Mario Jacques (8 shared papers)Janine T. Bossé (8 shared papers)Wendy A. Findlay (6 shared papers)Vincent Deslandes (7 shared papers)Paul R. Langford (8 shared papers)J. Simon Kroll (5 shared papers)Anne Bouevitch (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Genomics (7 papers)Journal of Clinical Microbiology (3 papers)Applied and Environmental Microbiology (3 papers)Journal of Bacteriology (3 papers)Infection and Immunity (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John H. E. Nash
39 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Microbiology 592
- Endocrinology 241
- Ecology 632
- Immunology 457
- Food Science 396
Countries citing papers authored by John H. E. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. E. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. E. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. E. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John H. E. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. E. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. E. Nash. The network helps show where John H. E. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. E. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 232 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 85 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 56 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 53 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 33 |
About John H. E. Nash
John H. E. Nash is a scholar working on Microbiology, Ecology, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (18 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (15 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (8 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (8 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (5 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (2 papers) and Escherichia coli research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (592 citations), Endocrinology (241 citations), Ecology (632 citations), Immunology (457 citations) and Food Science (396 citations). John H. E. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo N. Taboada, Mario Jacques, Janine T. Bossé, Wendy A. Findlay, Vincent Deslandes, Paul R. Langford, J. Simon Kroll, Anne Bouevitch, Josée Harel and Oksana Mykytczuk. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Genomics, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology and Infection and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.