This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prion more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Prion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prion.
About Prion
The 656 papers published in Prion in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Prion usually cover Neurology (252 papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (188 papers), Molecular Biology (621 papers), Physiology (130 papers) and Neurology (62 papers) specifically the topics of Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (560 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (250 papers), Trace Elements in Health (188 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (128 papers), RNA regulation and disease (48 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (44 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (27 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prion are Louise C. Serpell, James Shorter, Michael John Berridge, Thomas Scheibel, Lin Römer, Valerie L. Sim, Ehud Gazit, Leonardo M. Cortez, Adriano Aguzzi and Daniel E. Otzen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.