Scott Mitchell

1.4k citations
10 papers · 1.0k · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Mitchell

10 papers receiving 992 citations

Scott Mitchell's Hit Papers

Clinical Practice Guideline: Tinnitus 2014 · 571 citations
5710+4+8Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Scott Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Sensory Systems 526
  • Neurology 228
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 286
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
  • Speech and Hearing 52
Replace Kathryn Fackrell with:
Kathryn Fackrell United Kingdom
Antonia Marsden United Kingdom
Andréa Cintra Lopes Brazil
Hilary Davies‐Kershaw United Kingdom
Emily L. S. Jensen United States
D. Diane Zheng United States
Sandi Pirozzo Australia
Zhenchan Lu China
Daniel E. Rohe United States
Sarah Edelman Australia
Scott Mitchell relative to Kathryn Fackrell United Kingdom Kathryn Fackrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Kathryn Fackrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Mitchell. The network helps show where Scott Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Scott Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Scott Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Clinical Practice Guideline: Tinnitus
Hit paper breakdown →
2014571
2 2018210
3 201485
4 201649
5 201941
6 201432
7 201917
8 199310
9 20197
10 20196

About Scott Mitchell

Scott Mitchell is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Health, General Health Professions, Geography, Planning and Development and Physiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (526 citations), Neurology (228 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (286 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations) and Speech and Hearing (52 citations). Scott Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jared Streatfeild, David R. Hillman, Lynne Pezzullo, Dorothy Bruck, Philip Bromiley, Greg Reilly, David Souder, Robert Adams and Edward F. Ellerbeck. Their work appears in journals such as Otolaryngology, SLEEP, The Journal Of Hand Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and Organization Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact