Daniel E. Rohe

26 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Rohe
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Otorhinolaryngology 75
  • Neurology 92
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 134
  • Family Practice 11
  • Safety Research 42
Replace Sébastien Montel with:
Sébastien Montel France
Daniel Sacks United States
Hans Bogaardt Australia
Susan K. Effgen United States
Andrea D. Boan United States
Lars Dahlström Sweden
Tammeka Swinson Evans United States
Jason C. Nellis United States
Sean Mcguigan United Kingdom
Ahmed Yassin Jordan
Daniel E. Rohe relative to Sébastien Montel France Sébastien Montel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
Sébastien Montel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Rohe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Rohe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Rohe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Rohe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Rohe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Rohe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Rohe. The network helps show where Daniel E. Rohe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Rohe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Rohe Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Rohe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006145
2 1995135
3 2013108
4 198234
5 199826
6 198223
7 199818
8 199918
9 198518
10 201116
11 199715
12 200312
13
Psychological aspects of rehabilitation
201210
14 20029
15 19998
16 19898
17 20127
18 20165
19 20203
20 20032

About Daniel E. Rohe

Daniel E. Rohe is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Occupational Therapy, Safety Research and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper), Disability Education and Employment (1 paper), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (75 citations), Neurology (92 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (134 citations), Family Practice (11 citations) and Safety Research (42 citations). Daniel E. Rohe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James S. Krause, Scott D.Z. Eggers, Lawrence W. DeSanto, William C. Perry, Robert L. Keith, Neil T. Shepard, Kerry D. Olsen, Jeffrey P. Staab, Patricia A. Barrier and Paul A. Decker. Their work appears in journals such as Rehabilitation Psychology, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Counseling Psychology and Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact