David Blitzer

2.2k citations
101 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

David Blitzer

85 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

David Blitzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Clinical Biochemistry 209
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 208
  • Surgery 489
  • Molecular Biology 607
  • Transplantation 22
Replace T. J. Garrett with:
T. J. Garrett United States
Philip Connor United Kingdom
Eva Lang Germany
Julius H. Jacobson United States
Sabrena F. Noria United States
Vivek Mehta United States
Eckart Kreuzer Germany
Alexander Tsiskaridze Georgia
Ha Dang United States
Jeffrey D. Alexis United States
David Blitzer relative to T. J. Garrett United States T. J. Garrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36.6×
T. J. Garrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Blitzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Blitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Blitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Blitzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Blitzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Blitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Blitzer. The network helps show where David Blitzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Blitzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Blitzer Line = papers co-authored together David Blitzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020146
2 2018119
3 2019114
4 2019110
5 201895
6 202089
7 201988
8 201980
9 201979
10 202042
11 202241
12 201939
13 201734
14 201629
15 202023
16 201622
17 202018
18 201818
19 202018
20 202117

About David Blitzer

David Blitzer is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Gender Studies, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (20 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (17 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (13 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (9 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (9 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (209 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (208 citations), Surgery (489 citations), Molecular Biology (607 citations) and Transplantation (22 citations). David Blitzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alvise Guariento, Pedro J. del Nido, James D. McCully, Borami Shin, Arzoo Orfany, Ilias P. Doulamis, Kamila Moskowitzova, David Zurakowski, Giovanna Ramirez-Barbieri and Alan B. Packard. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Transplantation, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact