Sarah Stone

4.2k citations
28 papers · 792 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Stone

26 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers

Sarah Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Internal Medicine 84
  • Family Practice 34
  • Sensory Systems 83
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 268
Replace Bonnie Raingruber with:
Bonnie Raingruber United States
Pauline Adair United Kingdom
Ayda Çelebioğlu Türkiye
Karine Fournier Canada
Fatemeh Cheraghi Iran
Jesper Lundgren Sweden
Juliet Draper United Kingdom
Ketrina A. Sly Australia
Frances Badger United Kingdom
Esra Akın Korhan Türkiye
Sarah Stone relative to Bonnie Raingruber United States Bonnie Raingruber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.7×
Bonnie Raingruber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Stone. The network helps show where Sarah Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Stone Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009109
2 200893
3 199290
4 201584
5 200277
6 200353
7 201344
8
Comparison between videotape and personalized patient education for anticoagulant therapy.
198936
9 200032
10 199829
11 200725
12 200213
13 201913
14 201913
15 200212
16 198212
17 201811
18 199910
19 20228
20 19998

About Sarah Stone

Sarah Stone is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (84 citations), Family Practice (34 citations), Sensory Systems (83 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (268 citations). Sarah Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jean L. Kristeller, Donna M. Qualters, Jessica R. MacNeil, Wanda D. Barfield, Hafsatou Diop, Howard Cabral, Timothy A. Morris, Marian Renvall, Ian Jenkins and Joshua Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Journal, PEDIATRICS and Quality in Ageing and Older Adults.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact