Mark Quirk

2.6k citations
67 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Quirk

66 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark Quirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Family Practice 169
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 567
  • General Health Professions 451
  • Pharmacy 72
  • Physiology 352
Replace Steven R. Daugherty with:
Steven R. Daugherty United States
Michael Fordis United States
Barbara G. Bokhour United States
Kristofer Årestedt Sweden
Lisa M. Bellini United States
Sondra Zabar United States
Jana Jünger Germany
Janet P. Hafler United States
Jeanne M. Farnan United States
Elaine C. Meyer United States
Mark Quirk relative to Steven R. Daugherty United States Steven R. Daugherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Steven R. Daugherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Quirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Quirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Quirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Quirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Quirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Quirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Quirk. The network helps show where Mark Quirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Quirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Quirk Line = papers co-authored together Mark Quirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991230
2 1989182
3 1995111
4
Intuition and Metacognition in Medical Education: Keys to Developing Expertise
200692
5 199190
6 199990
7 200377
8 200874
9 198967
10 200567
11 200559
12 201059
13 200356
14 199352
15
Clinical teaching improvement: past and future for faculty development.
199750
16 199243
17 201543
18 199441
19 201040
20 200339

About Mark Quirk

Mark Quirk is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Physiology and Education, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (23 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (169 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (567 citations), General Health Professions (451 citations), Pharmacy (72 citations) and Physiology (352 citations). Mark Quirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sint Maarten and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Heather-Lyn Haley, Robert A. Ciottone, Judith K. Ockene, Kathleen M. Mazor, David Hatem, Warren J. Ferguson, Susan Starr, James R. Hébert, Rose S. Luippold and Jean L. Kristeller. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Teacher, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact