Sarah Flèche

28 papers receiving 811 citations

Sarah Flèche's Hit Papers

COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends 2020 · 441 citations
4410+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Sarah Flèche
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Health 191
  • Modeling and Simulation 102
  • Social Psychology 287
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Economics and Econometrics 205
Replace Carina Cornesse with:
Carina Cornesse Germany
Adam Fine United States
Elias Naumann Germany
Katja Möhring Germany
Jon Jachimowicz United States
Tobias Rettig Germany
Maximiliane Reifenscheid Germany
Francisco Pérez‐Arce United States
Stella R. Quah Singapore
Yoshiro Tsutsui Japan
Sarah Flèche relative to Carina Cornesse Germany Carina Cornesse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Carina Cornesse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Flèche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Flèche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Flèche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Flèche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Flèche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Flèche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Flèche. The network helps show where Sarah Flèche may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Flèche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Flèche Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Flèche links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends
Hit paper breakdown →
2020441
2 201867
3 201551
4 202042
5 202031
6 201230
7 201726
8 201923
9 201821
10 201815
11 201913
12 202313
13 201913
14 201412
15 201210
16 20207
17 20127
18 20246
19 20134
20 20214

About Sarah Flèche

Sarah Flèche is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (12 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Economic theories and models (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers) and demographic modeling and climate adaptation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (191 citations), Modeling and Simulation (102 citations), Social Psychology (287 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (205 citations). Sarah Flèche has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew E. Clark, Nattavudh Powdthavee, Abel Brodeur, Claudia Sénik, Richard Layard, Anthony Lepinteur, George Ward, Joan Costa‐Font, Andrew Clark and Warn N. Lekfuangfu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Health Economics, Review of Income and Wealth, The Review of Economics and Statistics and Kyklos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact