Sarah Flèche

25 papers receiving 726 citations

Sarah Flèche's Hit Papers

COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends 2020 · 417 citations
4170+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Sarah Flèche
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Modeling and Simulation 110
  • Health 183
  • Social Psychology 258
  • Clinical Psychology 159
  • Economics and Econometrics 200
Replace Carina Cornesse with:
Carina Cornesse Germany
Elias Naumann Germany
Katja Möhring Germany
Adam Fine United States
Jon Jachimowicz United States
Tobias Rettig Germany
Maximiliane Reifenscheid Germany
Sabine Friedel Germany
Francisco Pérez‐Arce United States
Xiaowei Xu United Kingdom
Sarah Flèche relative to Carina Cornesse Germany Carina Cornesse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Carina Cornesse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Flèche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Flèche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Flèche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Flèche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Flèche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Flèche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Flèche. The network helps show where Sarah Flèche may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Flèche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Flèche Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Flèche links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends
Hit paper breakdown →
2020417
2 201857
3 201549
4 202041
5 202026
6 201224
7 201722
8 201922
9 201820
10 201814
11 201913
12 202312
13 20198
14 20127
15 20127
16 20246
17 20206
18 20213
19 20213
20
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
20182

About Sarah Flèche

Sarah Flèche is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (12 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Economic theories and models (3 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers) and demographic modeling and climate adaptation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (110 citations), Health (183 citations), Social Psychology (258 citations), Clinical Psychology (159 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (200 citations). Sarah Flèche has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrew E. Clark, Nattavudh Powdthavee, Abel Brodeur, Claudia Sénik, Richard Layard, Joan Costa‐Font, Anthony Lepinteur, George Ward, Andrew Clark and Ricardo Pagán. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Health Economics, Review of Income and Wealth, Labour Economics and The Review of Economics and Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact