Labour Economics

2.0k papers and 58.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Labour Economics in the last decades have received a total of 58.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Labour Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.4k papers), Sociology and Political Science (605 papers) and General Health Professions (480 papers) specifically the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1.0k papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (408 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (348 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Labour Economics are Andrew E. Clark, David G. Blanchflower, Lisa Kahn, James J. Heckman, Dan‐Olof Rooth, Tim Kautz, Jochen Kluve, Joshua D. Angrist, Roberto Torrini and Alan Manning.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Labour Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Labour Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Labour Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Labour Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Labour Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Labour Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Labour Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025