Sacha Bem
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Papers in
-
- Embodied and Extended Cognition 3
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
- Neural dynamics and brain function 1
-
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 4
- Co-authors
- Antony S. R. Manstead (1 shared paper)Nico H. Frijda (1 shared paper)Huib Looren de Jong (3 shared papers)Huib de Jong (1 shared paper)Fred Keijzer (2 shared papers)A. H. C. van der Heijden (1 shared paper)M. Duijn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Theory & Psychology (3 papers)Philosophical Psychology (3 papers)Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (2 papers)Consciousness and Cognition (2 papers)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsRussiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sacha Bem
15 papers receiving 217 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- General Psychology 30
- General Decision Sciences 9
- Applied Psychology 21
- Social Psychology 87
- History and Philosophy of Science 17
Countries citing papers authored by Sacha Bem
This map shows the geographic impact of Sacha Bem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sacha Bem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sacha Bem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sacha Bem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sacha Bem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sacha Bem. The network helps show where Sacha Bem may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Sacha Bem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 108 | |
| 2 | Theoretical Issues in Psychology | 1997 | 28 |
| 3 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 5 | Studies in the History of Psychology and the Social Sciences 3 | 1985 | 15 |
| 6 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 0 |
About Sacha Bem
Sacha Bem is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Social Representations and Identity (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Migraine and Headache Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (30 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations), Applied Psychology (21 citations), Social Psychology (87 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations). Sacha Bem has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Antony S. R. Manstead, Nico H. Frijda, Huib Looren de Jong, Huib de Jong, Fred Keijzer, A. H. C. van der Heijden and M. Duijn. Their work appears in journals such as Theory & Psychology, Philosophical Psychology, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Consciousness and Cognition and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.