C. A. Mace
Impact in
- General Psychology top 10%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Herbert Feigl (1 shared paper)Michael Scriven (1 shared paper)Edwin Peel (1 shared paper)Roland Hall (1 shared paper)Philip E. Vernon (1 shared paper)Ernesto L. Schiffrin (1 shared paper)D.J. O’Connor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The British Journal of Aesthetics (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)British Journal of Educational Studies (1 paper)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
C. A. Mace
14 papers receiving 203 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- General Psychology 19
- History and Philosophy of Science 49
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 67
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
- Philosophy 32
Countries citing papers authored by C. A. Mace
This map shows the geographic impact of C. A. Mace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. A. Mace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. A. Mace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. A. Mace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. A. Mace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. A. Mace. The network helps show where C. A. Mace may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside C. A. Mace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1958 | 154 | |
| 2 | 1962 | 20 | |
| 3 | The Psychology of Study | 1968 | 19 |
| 4 | 1959 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1954 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1953 | 8 | |
| 7 | The Future of Functional Foods: Scientific Basis and Future Requirements | 1998 | 6 |
| 8 | 1958 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1962 | 5 | |
| 10 | Causal explanations in psychology | 1964 | 2 |
| 11 | 1954 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 13 | Inscape: the design of interiors | 1968 | 1 |
| 14 | Sibylla Or The Revival Of Prophecy | 2006 | 1 |
| 15 | 1953 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1954 | 0 |
About C. A. Mace
C. A. Mace is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (1 paper), Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (19 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (49 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (67 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations) and Philosophy (32 citations). C. A. Mace has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Feigl, Michael Scriven, Edwin Peel, Roland Hall, Philip E. Vernon, Ernesto L. Schiffrin and D.J. O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, The Philosophical Review, British Journal of Educational Studies, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.