Consciousness and Cognition

2.8k papers and 87.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Consciousness and Cognition in the last decades have received a total of 87.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Consciousness and Cognition usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (2.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (854 papers) and Social Psychology (705 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (801 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (434 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (374 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Consciousness and Cognition are Patrick Haggard, James Blair, Jaak Panksepp, Arnaud D’Argembeau, Martial Van der Linden, Chris Frith, Shaun Gallagher, Charles Spence, Albert Newen and Arne Dietrich.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Consciousness and Cognition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Consciousness and Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Consciousness and Cognition.

Countries where authors publish in Consciousness and Cognition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Consciousness and Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Consciousness and Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consciousness and Cognition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025