Ruth E. McKenzie

24 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Ruth E. McKenzie
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 271
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Clinical Psychology 77
Replace Liliana Amorim with:
Liliana Amorim Portugal
Teresa Costa Castanho Portugal
Simona F. Sacuiu Sweden
Linda Bäckman Sweden
M.J. Sender Palacios Spain
Mark E. Sanderson‐Cimino United States
Sarah‐Naomi James United Kingdom
Amy Fredrickson Australia
Anne Chocat France
Michelle Y. You United States
Ruth E. McKenzie relative to Liliana Amorim Portugal Liliana Amorim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Liliana Amorim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. McKenzie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. McKenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. McKenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. McKenzie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. McKenzie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. McKenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. McKenzie. The network helps show where Ruth E. McKenzie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. McKenzie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. McKenzie Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. McKenzie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201867
2 202162
3 201751
4 201348
5 201434
6 201834
7 202134
8 201431
9 201628
10 201422
11 202122
12 201320
13 202120
14 201317
15 201516
16 202013
17 202113
18 201912
19 201510
20 20228

About Ruth E. McKenzie

Ruth E. McKenzie is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (271 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations) and Clinical Psychology (77 citations). Ruth E. McKenzie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carol E. Franz, Michael J. Lyons, William S. Kremen, Matthew S. Panizzon, Hong Xian, Kristen C. Jacobson, Rosemary Toomey, Eero Vuoksimaa, Chandra A. Reynolds and Richard L. Hauger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Neurobiology of Aging, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Psychology and Aging and Psychoneuroendocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact