Psychology and Aging

3.9k papers and 244.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.9k papers published in Psychology and Aging in the last decades have received a total of 244.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology and Aging usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k papers), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (1.0k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (962 papers) specifically the topics of Aging and Gerontology Research (1.0k papers), Memory Processes and Influences (530 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (446 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology and Aging are Laura L. Carstensen, Ulman Lindenberger, Paul B. Baltes, Roberto Cabeza, Martin Pinquart, Silvia Sörensen, Christopher Hertzog, Neal Krause, Carol D. Ryff and Paul Verhaeghen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology and Aging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology and Aging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology and Aging.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology and Aging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology and Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology and Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology and Aging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025