Ruth Davis

43 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers

Ruth Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Health 210
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 220
  • Gender Studies 82
  • General Health Professions 191
  • Clinical Psychology 161
Replace Muthusamy Sivakami with:
Muthusamy Sivakami India
Carolyn Lauckner United States
Holly Korda United States
Roberto Vargas United States
Sharon Thompson United States
John Wiecha United States
Nicole Leduc Canada
Jonathan Rosen United States
Michelle L. Litchman United States
Rachel S. Purvis United States
Ruth Davis relative to Muthusamy Sivakami India Muthusamy Sivakami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Muthusamy Sivakami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Davis. The network helps show where Ruth Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Davis Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005193
2 200190
3 200282
4 200371
5 200066
6 199750
7 200150
8 200234
9 200032
10 198530
11 200027
12 200724
13 200124
14 200018
15 200316
16 200115
17 199815
18 201915
19
Truth, Deduction, and Computation: Logic and Semantics for Computer Science
198913
20 201412

About Ruth Davis

Ruth Davis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 53 papers that have together received 968 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (5 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (4 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (3 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers) and International Maritime Law Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (210 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (220 citations), Gender Studies (82 citations), General Health Professions (191 citations) and Clinical Psychology (161 citations). Ruth Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include John R. Peters, Craig J. Currie, Tessa Kennedy‐Martin, Michael Davies, Simon Dixon, Judy Mill, Janice Roper, Michael G. Kennedy, Wendy Austin and Glyn Elwyn. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Studies International Forum, Journal of Professional Nursing, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, Western Journal of Nursing Research and Diabetic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact