Donna Mead

781 citations
31 papers · 604 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Donna Mead

31 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Donna Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Research and Theory 36
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 23
  • General Health Professions 146
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 23
Replace Simen A. Steindal with:
Simen A. Steindal Norway
Margaret Landers Ireland
Pirjo Kaakinen Finland
Karen McCutcheon United Kingdom
Sarah E. Newton United States
Daphne Martin United Kingdom
Nalini Jairath United States
Marc‐André Maheu‐Cadotte Canada
Suh‐Ing Hsieh Taiwan
Antonia Arnaert Canada
Donna Mead relative to Simen A. Steindal Norway Simen A. Steindal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Simen A. Steindal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donna Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donna Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donna Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna Mead. The network helps show where Donna Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donna Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donna Mead Line = papers co-authored together Donna Mead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004135
2 2004105
3 200185
4 200371
5 200755
6 200120
7 200018
8 201114
9 199714
10
Exercise Programs for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
200313
11 20047
12 19797
13 19936
14 19976
15 20026
16 19966
17 19925
18 19904
19
The integration of a database and a statistical program in the analysis of a large scale survey in nursing.
19924
20 19943

About Donna Mead

Donna Mead is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 604 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Nursing education and management (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (36 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (23 citations), General Health Professions (146 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (23 citations). Donna Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Laurence Moseley, Laurie Moseley, Ruth Northway, Ian Mansell, Glyn Elwyn, Gina Dolan, Ruth Davis, Adrian Edwards, Christine Atwell and Christine Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Researcher, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact