Robert Smith

20 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Robert Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Engineering 6
  • Genetics 70
  • Reproductive Medicine 20
  • Cancer Research 32
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Replace Vignesh Ravichandran with:
Vignesh Ravichandran United States
Constantinos G. Zografos Greece
Christopher Woodhouse United Kingdom
Aditya Deshpande United States
Matthias Graupp Austria
Mahesh Kumar India
Lisa Roth United States
Moshe Levin Israel
Y. Ben David Israel
Zheying Liu China
Robert Smith relative to Vignesh Ravichandran United States Vignesh Ravichandran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Vignesh Ravichandran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Smith. The network helps show where Robert Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199687
2 198937
3 198925
4 202321
5
Global return on investment and cost-effectiveness of WHO's HEAR interventions for hearing loss : a modelling study
202220
6 199817
7 202011
8 202111
9 199910
10 20186
11 20243
12 20213
13 19983
14
Stakeholder Research Priorities for Smoking Cessation Interventions within Lung Cancer Screening Programs
20173
15 20212
16 20212
17 20072
18 20251
19 20211
20 20241

About Robert Smith

Robert Smith is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Transportation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency (1 paper), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper) and Noise Effects and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (6 citations), Genetics (70 citations), Reproductive Medicine (20 citations), Cancer Research (32 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). Robert Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Charles L. Vogel, Alan Keller, Philip Bonomi, Aman U. Buzdar, Félix Schmid, W. J. Anderson, Andrew W. Rogers, Peter Dockery, Tin Chiu Li and Ian Cooke. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health, Cancer, PharmacoEconomics, Medical Decision Making and JDR Clinical & Translational Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact