Hazel Squires

51 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Hazel Squires
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 18
  • Economics and Econometrics 135
  • Internal Medicine 14
  • Ophthalmology 35
  • Oncology 107
Replace Usa Chaikledkaew with:
Usa Chaikledkaew Thailand
Nirmala Bhoo‐Pathy Malaysia
Andrea M. Burden Switzerland
Yunhe Zhao China
Francisco Batel Marques Portugal
Ryan Ferguson United States
Khawar Kazmi Pakistan
Dong‐Sook Kim South Korea
Carrie Horwitch United States
Paul Celano United States
Hazel Squires relative to Usa Chaikledkaew Thailand Usa Chaikledkaew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Usa Chaikledkaew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Squires

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Squires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Squires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Squires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Squires

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Squires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Squires. The network helps show where Hazel Squires may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Squires, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hazel Squires Line = papers co-authored together Hazel Squires links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010170
2 201284
3 201663
4 201161
5 201057
6 201253
7 201253
8 201732
9 201732
10 201729
11 201727
12 201627
13 201627
14
NICE DSU Technical Support Document 13: Identifying and Reviewing Evidence to Inform the Conceptualisation and Population of Cost-Effectiveness Models [Internet]
201124
15 201122
16 201122
17 201322
18 201119
19 201519
20 201218

About Hazel Squires

Hazel Squires is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (3 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (18 citations), Economics and Econometrics (135 citations), Internal Medicine (14 citations), Ophthalmology (35 citations) and Oncology (107 citations). Hazel Squires has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Paul Tappenden, Alan Brennan, John Stevens, Christopher Carroll, Katy Cooper, J. Chilcott, Daniel Hind, Diana Papaioannou, Emma Simpson and Jonathan Michaels. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, PharmacoEconomics, Health Technology Assessment, Diabetic Medicine and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact