Robert R. Wright

42 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Robert R. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 32
  • General Health Professions 109
  • Communication 30
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 41
Replace André Novo with:
André Novo Portugal
Pernille Tanggaard Andersen Denmark
Britta Herbig Germany
Kathy Davis United Kingdom
Yan Piaw Chua Malaysia
Jeffrey Colman Salloway United States
John G. Cope United States
Cath Rogers‐Clark Australia
Kirsty Wild New Zealand
Lisa S. Whiting United Kingdom
Robert R. Wright relative to André Novo Portugal André Novo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
André Novo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. Wright. The network helps show where Robert R. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert R. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert R. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Robert R. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197049
2 201348
3 201646
4 197544
5 201543
6 201441
7 201330
8 201230
9 201728
10 201723
11 201521
12 201520
13 197919
14 202018
15 202115
16 201414
17
Cases and materials on land use
199112
18 201412
19 202312
20 201611

About Robert R. Wright

Robert R. Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (3 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (41 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (32 citations), General Health Professions (109 citations), Communication (30 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (41 citations). Robert R. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia D. Mohr, Ryan Olson, Brad Wipfli, Robert R. Sinclair, Myron Pollycove, Sharon V. Thompson, Barry R. Meisenberg, Laurie M. Jacobs, Diane L. Elliot and Jennifer A. Hess. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Religion and Health, Stress and Health, American Journal of Public Health and Canadian Public Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact