Robert P. Minch

22 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Robert P. Minch
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Information Systems and Management 83
  • Computer Science Applications 39
  • Information Systems 117
  • Management Information Systems 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 150
Replace Mitzi G. Pitts with:
Mitzi G. Pitts United States
Jon Postel United States
Andrea L. Houston United States
Jing Luan China
Zahid Hussain Pakistan
Joline Morrison United States
Margit Pohl Austria
Wolfgang Wörndl Germany
Dilek Karahoca Türkiye
Hamaad Rafique Italy
Robert P. Minch relative to Mitzi G. Pitts United States Mitzi G. Pitts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Mitzi G. Pitts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert P. Minch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert P. Minch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert P. Minch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert P. Minch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert P. Minch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert P. Minch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert P. Minch. The network helps show where Robert P. Minch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Robert P. Minch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert P. Minch Line = papers co-authored together Robert P. Minch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200977
2 200471
3 198650
4 199049
5 198933
6 201326
7 200522
8 198321
9 201517
10 19899
11 20039
12 20067
13 20106
14
Expanding Views of Technology Acceptance: Seeking Factors Explaining Security Control Adoption
20075
15 20025
16 20074
17 20113
18 20073
19 19922
20 19962

About Robert P. Minch

Robert P. Minch is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (7 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers), Information and Cyber Security (3 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers) and Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (83 citations), Computer Science Applications (39 citations), Information Systems (117 citations), Management Information Systems (39 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (150 citations). Robert P. Minch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Chenoweth, Thomas F. Gattiker, Nina M. Ray, G. Lawrence Sanders, James R. Burns and Patrick Shannon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Technology Education Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, MIS Quarterly and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact