Tim Chenoweth

16 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Tim Chenoweth
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Information Systems and Management 55
  • Management Science and Operations Research 81
  • Management Information Systems 56
  • Information Systems 98
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Leslie R. Fine with:
Leslie R. Fine United States
Fatemeh Zahedi United States
Haein Lee South Korea
Andy Powell United Kingdom
Gregory Todd Williams United States
Gurvirender Tejay United States
Humayun Zafar United States
Gizem Korkmaz United States
Parker Barnes United States
Nicolas Kaufmann Germany
Tim Chenoweth relative to Leslie R. Fine United States Leslie R. Fine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Leslie R. Fine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Chenoweth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Chenoweth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Chenoweth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Chenoweth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Chenoweth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Chenoweth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Chenoweth. The network helps show where Tim Chenoweth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Tim Chenoweth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Chenoweth Line = papers co-authored together Tim Chenoweth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200977
2 200647
3 200334
4 199629
5 199629
6 200018
7 201917
8 200312
9 20106
10
Expanding Views of Technology Acceptance: Seeking Factors Explaining Security Control Adoption
20075
11 20074
12 20203
13
Automated Feedback as a Convergence Tool
20162
14 20041
15
STORED PROCEDURE LANGUAGE EXTENSIONS FORCOUPLING WEB SERVICES MANAGERS AND DBMS
20021
16
Corporal Punishment: Does It Hinder the Development of Children?.
20001
17 20230

About Tim Chenoweth

Tim Chenoweth is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Management Information Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Stock Market Forecasting Methods (3 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (3 papers), Information and Cyber Security (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (55 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (81 citations), Management Information Systems (56 citations), Information Systems (98 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Tim Chenoweth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Minch, Thomas F. Gattiker, Zoran Obradović, Robert D. St. Louis, Haluk Demirkan, David Schuff, Robert St. Louis, K. Dow Scott and Michael Goul. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Decision Support Systems, Empirical Economics, Neurocomputing and Information Systems Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact