Robert Morris

24 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Robert Morris
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Algebra and Number Theory 26
  • Geometry and Topology 37
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • Genetics 102
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 42
Replace Leo van Iersel with:
Leo van Iersel Netherlands
Graham Tebb Austria
Christopher Tuffley New Zealand
Sascha H. Duttke United States
Alan Wolf United States
James P. Balhoff United States
Max Shpak United States
Marianne Barrier United States
Alan J. Terry United Kingdom
Robert Morris relative to Leo van Iersel Netherlands Leo van Iersel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Leo van Iersel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Morris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Morris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Morris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Morris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Morris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Morris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Morris. The network helps show where Robert Morris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Morris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Morris Line = papers co-authored together Robert Morris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197797
2 202062
3 201655
4 197841
5 197139
6 201731
7
Studies in Mathematics Education
198629
8 197220
9 198211
10 20199
11 20109
12 19938
13 20157
14 19636
15 19785
16
The putative Austrian x red pine hybrid: a test of paternity based on allelic variation at enzyme-specifying loci.
19804
17 19704
18 20173
19
Interdisciplinary Introductory Course in Bioinformatics
20102
20 20131

About Robert Morris

Robert Morris is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Geometry and Topology, Education and Plant Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (2 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (26 citations), Geometry and Topology (37 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), Genetics (102 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (42 citations). Robert Morris has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D. P. Fowler, Philip T. Spieth, Vinay S. Mahajan, Vinay Viswanadham, Ezana Demissie, Shiv Pillai, Ajit Varki, Hamid Mattoo, Neil D. Warnock and Johnathan J. Dalzell. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Molecular Therapy, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Prospects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact