Robert L. Moore

123 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Robert L. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Computer Science Applications 408
  • Algebra and Number Theory 130
  • Education 621
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 255
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 145
Replace Julia Mueller with:
Julia Mueller United Kingdom
Ying Cheng United States
Ben Green China
Nambury S. Raju United States
Chris Christensen United States
Joachim Funke Germany
James Martin United States
Thomas Peters United States
Ahmed Aldraiweesh Saudi Arabia
Henry Braun United States
Robert L. Moore relative to Julia Mueller United Kingdom Julia Mueller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.0×
Julia Mueller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Moore. The network helps show where Robert L. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert L. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert L. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Robert L. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984172
2 2020160
3 1983131
4 1986102
5 202094
6 200589
7
King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine
199079
8 202066
9 199560
10 202259
11 201457
12 199157
13 200552
14 202049
15 202447
16 198344
17 201943
18 202240
19 198740
20 202035

About Robert L. Moore

Robert L. Moore is a scholar working on Education, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Computer Science Applications and Applied Mathematics, having authored 147 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (19 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (17 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (13 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (11 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (7 papers) and E-Learning and Knowledge Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (408 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (130 citations), Education (621 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (255 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (145 citations). Robert L. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Edward P. Lazear, Florence Martin, Chuang Wang, Yan Chen, Carl D. Westine, Patrick R. Lowenthal, Eleanor Brown, Kevin Oliver, Tavan T. Trent and Alan Hopenwasser. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, TechTrends, The Journal of Economic Education, Distance Education and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact