Robert James Smith

46 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Robert James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cultural Studies 60
  • Law 48
  • General Social Sciences 11
  • Anthropology 37
  • Religious studies 25
Replace A. Javier Treviño with:
A. Javier Treviño United States
R. J. Walker New Zealand
Arun Kundnani United States
Edward L. Ayers United States
Bob Blauner United States
Louis Filler United States
Adolfo Gilly Mexico
Teshome H. Gabriel United States
Riva Kastoryano France
Mohammed Abu‐Nimer United States
Robert James Smith relative to A. Javier Treviño United States A. Javier Treviño's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
A. Javier Treviño · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert James Smith. The network helps show where Robert James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert James Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988149
2 198336
3 197926
4 199026
5 198220
6 202017
7 198416
8 200313
9 197810
10 20189
11 19798
12 19828
13 19998
14 20218
15 19837
16 20166
17 20175
18 19624
19
Exploring Teacher Perceptions of the Leadership Practices of Middle and High School Principals
20034
20
Establishing and developing high performing leadership teams
20104

About Robert James Smith

Robert James Smith is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Anthropology, Education, History and Social Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (13 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers), Educational Leadership and Practices (6 papers), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (4 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning (4 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers) and School Leadership and Teacher Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (60 citations), Law (48 citations), General Social Sciences (11 citations), Anthropology (37 citations) and Religious studies (25 citations). Robert James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank K. Upham, Ogbu U. Kalu, Jean-François Sirinelli, Thomas C. Smith, Mark Brundrett, Tony Bush, Wendy Boyd, David Gordon, James L. Pate and Susan B. Hanley. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of Japanese Studies, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Community Mental Health Journal and Public Opinion Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact