Thomas C. Smith

119 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Thomas C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 168
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 123
  • Cultural Studies 179
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 616
  • Emergency Medicine 143
Replace Thomas Gibson with:
Thomas Gibson United States
Helen Young Australia
James Zhang United States
Sidney Goldstein United States
Norman G. Levinsky United States
J. Adam Law United Kingdom
R. I. G. Hughes United Kingdom
Thomas Woodcock United Kingdom
James E. Davis United States
Ruth Ellen Bulger United States
Thomas C. Smith relative to Thomas Gibson United States Thomas Gibson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.9×
Thomas Gibson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 130 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988318
2 1986169
3 1988131
4 1971119
5 197997
6 198097
7 197995
8 198866
9 198862
10 195954
11 195650
12 201440
13 196936
14 198632
15 200730
16 197330
17 196928
18 199728
19 197526
20 197725

About Thomas C. Smith

Thomas C. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 130 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (12 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (10 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (168 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (123 citations), Cultural Studies (179 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (616 citations) and Emergency Medicine (143 citations). Thomas C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include John J. Marini, Kenneth M. Rosen, Christopher R.C. Wyndham, Charles Levinson, William B. Hauser, Sidney Levitsky, P Denes, Ramesh C. Dhingra, William W. Lockwood and Bradley J. Hindman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cellular Physiology, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Endocrinology, Circulation and The Journal of Membrane Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact