Robert Gray

699 citations
36 papers · 507 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Gray

27 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers

Robert Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 117
  • Social Psychology 217
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 82
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 26
Replace Camilo Charron with:
Camilo Charron France
Jefferson M. Koonce United States
Tate Kubose United States
Wiel H. Janssen Netherlands
Björn Badura Germany
Eric T. Greenlee United States
Rina Cercarelli Australia
Juliana Goh United States
Yvette J. Tenney United States
Stephanie M. Doane United States
Robert Gray relative to Camilo Charron France Camilo Charron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Camilo Charron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Gray. The network helps show where Robert Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Gray Line = papers co-authored together Robert Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008274
2 198480
3 201627
4 199218
5 200212
6 20219
7 20199
8 20159
9 20238
10 20198
11 19778
12 19838
13 20205
14 20194
15 20094
16 19804
17 20243
18
Adaptive Game Input Using Knowledge of Player Capability: Designing for Individuals with Different Abilities
20183
19 20222
20 20252

About Robert Gray

Robert Gray is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 36 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (2 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (117 citations), Social Psychology (217 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (26 citations). Robert Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Colin B. Begg, Robert A. Greenes, John P. Sullivan, Jeffrey R. Saffle, Jane Shelby, Martin Biermann, Charles Spence, Kamila Misiejuk, Nick Reed and Cristy Ho. Their work appears in journals such as Political Science Quarterly, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Technology Pedagogy and Education, Innovative Higher Education and School Science and Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact