School Science and Mathematics

3.3k papers and 29.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in School Science and Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 29.1k indexed citations. Papers published in School Science and Mathematics usually cover Education (1.9k papers), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (575 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (497 papers) specifically the topics of Science Education and Pedagogy (689 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (646 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (574 papers). The most active scholars publishing in School Science and Mathematics are Kevin D. Finson, Carla C. Johnson, Norman G. Lederman, Larry G. Enochs, Kenneth Tobin, Robert E. Yager, Iris M. Riggs, Alan Zollman, William F. McComas and Nir Orion.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in School Science and Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in School Science and Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in School Science and Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in School Science and Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in School Science and Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in School Science and Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites School Science and Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025