Robert Fleetcroft

1.6k citations
38 papers · 962 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Fleetcroft

37 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Robert Fleetcroft
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Health Professions 448
  • Health 82
  • Family Practice 18
  • Pharmacology 79
  • Health Information Management 43
Replace Ian McRae with:
Ian McRae Australia
Laurann E. Yen Australia
Hueiming Liu Australia
Davorina Petek Slovenia
Antje Miksch Germany
Allison Low United States
Nick Verhaeghe Belgium
Kelsey Chalmers Australia
Steven B. Cohen United States
Mary K. Snyder United States
Robert Fleetcroft relative to Ian McRae Australia Ian McRae's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Ian McRae · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Fleetcroft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Fleetcroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Fleetcroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Fleetcroft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Fleetcroft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Fleetcroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Fleetcroft. The network helps show where Robert Fleetcroft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Fleetcroft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Fleetcroft Line = papers co-authored together Robert Fleetcroft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201699
2 200896
3
Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study.
200791
4
Randomised controlled trial
201667
5 200563
6 201458
7 201056
8 201452
9 201347
10 201634
11 201031
12 201630
13 201628
14 201226
15 201422
16 201617
17 201616
18 198515
19 201315
20 200813

About Robert Fleetcroft

Robert Fleetcroft is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Family Practice, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (14 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (448 citations), Health (82 citations), Family Practice (18 citations), Pharmacology (79 citations) and Health Information Management (43 citations). Robert Fleetcroft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Cookson, Nicholas Steel, Amanda Caroline Howe, Susan Maisey, Miqdad Asaria, Shehzad Ali, Charlotte Salter, Toby Oliver Smith, Allan Clark and Philip Conaghan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy and Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact