Peter Schofield
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 21
-
- Migration, Health and Trauma 8
- Co-authors
- Mark Ashworth (36 shared papers)Patrick White (12 shared papers)Peter Beresford (5 shared papers)Jayati Das‐Munshi (18 shared papers)Paul T. Seed (9 shared papers)Benjamin Geiger (1 shared paper)R. Padovani (1 shared paper)Andrew J. Einstein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (16 papers)Psychological Medicine (7 papers)Schizophrenia Research (4 papers)PLoS ONE (4 papers)BMC Family Practice (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomQatarUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Schofield
84 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 94
- General Health Professions 565
- Health 179
- Psychiatry and Mental health 225
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 302
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schofield
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schofield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schofield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schofield. The network helps show where Peter Schofield may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 319 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 31 |
About Peter Schofield
Peter Schofield is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Epidemiology and Health, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (21 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (17 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (16 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (16 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (8 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (94 citations), General Health Professions (565 citations), Health (179 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (225 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (302 citations). Peter Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Ashworth, Patrick White, Peter Beresford, Jayati Das‐Munshi, Paul T. Seed, Benjamin Geiger, R. Padovani, Andrew J. Einstein, Philip H. Heintz and Donald L. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Psychological Medicine, Schizophrenia Research, PLoS ONE and BMC Family Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.