Peter Schofield

94 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Peter Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 95
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 107
  • General Health Professions 384
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 290
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 185
Replace Anne L. Taylor-Vaisey with:
Anne L. Taylor-Vaisey Canada
Jason Murray Sutherland Canada
Nancy E. Morden United States
D A Davis Canada
Michael P. Phelan United States
F M Wolf United States
Lorena Romero Australia
Jamie Brehaut Canada
Tania D. Strout United States
Betsy Lynn Sleath United States
Peter Schofield relative to Anne L. Taylor-Vaisey Canada Anne L. Taylor-Vaisey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Anne L. Taylor-Vaisey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schofield. The network helps show where Peter Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Peter Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012354
2 2013223
3 201598
4 202068
5 201158
6 200957
7 201056
8 201752
9 201851
10 200850
11 201647
12 201444
13 201141
14 201641
15
How self directed support is failing to deliver personal budgets and personalisation
201240
16 201640
17 201838
18 201537
19 201536
20 201136

About Peter Schofield

Peter Schofield is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (8 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (95 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (107 citations), General Health Professions (384 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (290 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (185 citations). Peter Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark J. Ashworth, Patrick T. White, Jayati Das‐Munshi, Peter Beresford, Paul Townsend Seed, Claire Cousins, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Benjamin Geiger, Donald L. Miller and Madan Mohan Rehani. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Psychological Medicine, PLoS ONE, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology and Schizophrenia Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact