Rick Tuttle
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Papers in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 3
-
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 2
- Co-authors
- Jean Cassuto (4 shared papers)Mats Jodal (4 shared papers)O Lundgren (4 shared papers)Jan Fahrenkrug (1 shared paper)William F. Ward (1 shared paper)Robert P. Casillas (3 shared papers)Claire R. Croutch (3 shared papers)Raymond C. Rancourt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (2 papers)Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (2 papers)Gut (1 paper)Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (1 paper)Toxicological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenDenmark
In The Last Decade
Rick Tuttle
10 papers receiving 384 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Gastroenterology 123
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
- Endocrinology 30
- Pharmacy 21
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 19
Countries citing papers authored by Rick Tuttle
This map shows the geographic impact of Rick Tuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rick Tuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rick Tuttle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rick Tuttle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rick Tuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rick Tuttle. The network helps show where Rick Tuttle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rick Tuttle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 120 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 86 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1979 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 1 |
About Rick Tuttle
Rick Tuttle is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Small Animals, Plant Science, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (2 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (1 paper), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (1 paper), Occupational exposure and asthma (1 paper), Biochemical effects in animals (1 paper) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (123 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (135 citations), Endocrinology (30 citations), Pharmacy (21 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (19 citations). Rick Tuttle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jean Cassuto, Mats Jodal, O Lundgren, Jan Fahrenkrug, William F. Ward, Robert P. Casillas, Claire R. Croutch, Raymond C. Rancourt, Vasanthi R. Sunil and Marta Napierała. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Gut, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and Toxicological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.