Rick Csiernik

1.1k citations
87 papers · 762 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Rick Csiernik

79 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Rick Csiernik
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Public Administration 109
  • General Health Professions 392
  • Health 105
  • Demography 91
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 79
Replace Tine Van Regenmortel with:
Tine Van Regenmortel Belgium
Madeleine R. Stoner United States
Javier F. Boyas United States
Ronit D. Leichtentritt Israel
Sheila M. Neysmith Canada
Barbra Teater United States
Mary Tilki United Kingdom
David P. Moxley United States
Rich Janzen Canada
John Poulin United States
Rick Csiernik relative to Tine Van Regenmortel Belgium Tine Van Regenmortel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Tine Van Regenmortel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rick Csiernik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rick Csiernik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rick Csiernik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rick Csiernik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rick Csiernik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rick Csiernik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rick Csiernik. The network helps show where Rick Csiernik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rick Csiernik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rick Csiernik Line = papers co-authored together Rick Csiernik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201145
2 200244
3 200842
4 200631
5 201127
6 200626
7 200526
8 201225
9 201825
10 200223
11 200723
12 199523
13 201021
14 201020
15
Gaining ground, losing ground: the paradoxes of rural homelessness.
201020
16 199718
17 200218
18 199618
19 200215
20 201214

About Rick Csiernik

Rick Csiernik is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration, Health, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (13 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (11 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (109 citations), General Health Professions (392 citations), Health (105 citations), Demography (91 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (79 citations). Rick Csiernik has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David W. Adams, Cheryl Forchuk, Elsabeth Jensen, Catherine Ward‐Griffin, Katy Turner, Dermot Hurley, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Paul Chaulk, Abraham Rudnick and Mary‐Lou Martin. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought, Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, Journal of Nursing Education and Journal of Muslim Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact